• Advertisement
Xclusively Jaguar
SNG Barratt
David Marks Garages
Make a donation to XJ40.com

AJ6/16 vs AJ26

Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:19 pm

AJ6/16 vs AJ26

Postby jamesm123 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:55 am

I have to say after owning two Range Rover Classic 3.9 V8’s, I’m a little scared of any V8 engine. I’m also a relatively new XJ40 owner and have had nothing but great experiences with this and the two XJ-S’s I’ve had in the past and the AJ6 engine in general. I’ve read all about Nikasil bores and a pal of mine reluctantly had to get rid of his Daimler V8 (X308?) after years of problems. Has anyone run/owned both cars? Is there a great deal of difference?
I’d be interested in opinions :)

Posts: 2884
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:17 am
Location: Cambridge

Re: AJ6/16 vs AJ26

Postby katar83 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:36 pm

Majority of X308 I've ever seen had either engine or gearbox issues but that's mainly from years of neglect in the past. People generally just dont service well ,cars that cost £2k at most where visit to a dealer can cost half the value of the car. Of course there are good examples and well cared x308 will run better than a 40 with its ancient AJ6 but it seems its a rather rare situation these days. I wouldn't worry much about Nikasil issues, I'd say majority of cars that are still around most likely had this sorted.
1996, 3.2 SWB X300 - Finally a rust free daily driver :)
1997, 4.0 LWB X300 - Unlucky car.
1988, 3.6S XJS - Never ending restoration project.
1994, 3.2S X300 - Accident damaged, October 2015. Gone!
1994, 3.2S XJ40 - Long gone.